Publicação

Validation with videometry of an integrated system to assess horizontal intra-cyclic velocity with a mechanical speedo-meter

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:The aim of this paper was to: validate an integrated system (i.e., software application and hardware after calibration) to assess human’s horizontal intra-cyclic velocity with a mechanical speedo-meter. System validation was done for a set of land-based human locomotion techniques (from slow walk to maximal running) in four subjects and comparing it with a videometric system (i.e. APAS). There were no significant differences between pair wise data (speedo-meter versus APAS data) using student‘s t-test for both velocity coefficient of variation and maximal velocity. Linear regression models where very high for both the velocity coefficient of variation and maximal velocity. More than 80% of the Bland-Altman plots were within 1.96 standard-deviations.
Autores principais:Barbosa, Tiago M.
Outros Autores:Costa, M.J.; Morais, J.E.; Jesus, Sérgio; Silva, A.J.; Batista, José; Gonçalves, José
Assunto:Instrument Locomotion
Ano:2011
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:documento de conferência
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Biblioteca Digital do IPB
Descrição
Resumo:The aim of this paper was to: validate an integrated system (i.e., software application and hardware after calibration) to assess human’s horizontal intra-cyclic velocity with a mechanical speedo-meter. System validation was done for a set of land-based human locomotion techniques (from slow walk to maximal running) in four subjects and comparing it with a videometric system (i.e. APAS). There were no significant differences between pair wise data (speedo-meter versus APAS data) using student‘s t-test for both velocity coefficient of variation and maximal velocity. Linear regression models where very high for both the velocity coefficient of variation and maximal velocity. More than 80% of the Bland-Altman plots were within 1.96 standard-deviations.