Publicação

Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of innovative agar extraction technologies from red seaweeds

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Developing efficient and sustainable extraction technologies for valuable biocompounds from seaweed is crucial to overcome the limitations of conventional technologies. This study aims to compare three innovative technologies for agar extraction from two red seaweed species, G. sesquipedale and G. vermiculophylla: subcritical water extraction (performed at 125°C, 2.5atm, 1min, and at 140°C, 3.8atm, 1s), moderate electric fields (applied at 85°C for 120min and 95°C for 180min), and a combination of both methods. The comparison used life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methodologies, considering a gate-to-gate approach. The combined technology demonstrated the lowest energy consumption, with 67MJ/kgagar for G. vermiculophylla and 100MJ/kgagar for G. sesquipedale. A carbon footprint reduction of up to 94% was obtained when compared to the control, with 15.9 kgCO2 eq. /kgagar for G. vermiculophylla and 20.4 kgCO2 eq. /kgagar for G. sesquipedale. Using photovoltaic panels as alternative energy further cut carbon emissions by 50%. The cost analysis showed that the combined technology was the most cost-effective extraction method.
Autores principais:Pereira, Sara Gonçalves
Outros Autores:Martins, António A.; Mata, Teresa M.; Pereira, Ricardo Nuno Correia; Teixeira, J. A.; Rocha, Cristina M. R.
Assunto:Agar extraction Life Cycle Assessment Life Cycle Costing Moderate Electric Fields Subcritical Water Extraction Macroalgae
Ano:2024
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade do Minho
Idioma:inglês
Origem:RepositóriUM - Universidade do Minho
Descrição
Resumo:Developing efficient and sustainable extraction technologies for valuable biocompounds from seaweed is crucial to overcome the limitations of conventional technologies. This study aims to compare three innovative technologies for agar extraction from two red seaweed species, G. sesquipedale and G. vermiculophylla: subcritical water extraction (performed at 125°C, 2.5atm, 1min, and at 140°C, 3.8atm, 1s), moderate electric fields (applied at 85°C for 120min and 95°C for 180min), and a combination of both methods. The comparison used life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methodologies, considering a gate-to-gate approach. The combined technology demonstrated the lowest energy consumption, with 67MJ/kgagar for G. vermiculophylla and 100MJ/kgagar for G. sesquipedale. A carbon footprint reduction of up to 94% was obtained when compared to the control, with 15.9 kgCO2 eq. /kgagar for G. vermiculophylla and 20.4 kgCO2 eq. /kgagar for G. sesquipedale. Using photovoltaic panels as alternative energy further cut carbon emissions by 50%. The cost analysis showed that the combined technology was the most cost-effective extraction method.