Publicação
COMPLIANCE, FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND EXCEPTIONALITIES: QUESTIONS AND PRACTICAL AND THEORETICAL REDUNDANCIES ACCORDING TO APPLICATION FINDINGS?
| Resumo: | Abstract This legal article aims to confront and foster interactions between the compliance institute and fundamental rights, in theoretical and factual terms. Thus, the present text, resulting from analytical-bibliographic, deductive, inductive and propositional methodology research, intends to advance in one of the facets of the advent of compliance, namely, the relative to its arrival amid the figure of a lot of fundamental rights already classically and constitutionally established. At times in agreement, at times in contrast, compliance policies deserve a deep examination, in order to confirm or not the hypothesis according to which they contrast, harmonize or, simply, are epistemological redundancy inside the larger universe of legal sciences. Classificatory creations and examples will be brought to light, with a greater focus on specific Brazilian legislation, towards which the entire construction and evolution of this Article will be based. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Bonizzato,Luigi |
| Assunto: | compliance fundamental rights Constitution |
| Ano: | 2023 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso aberto |
| Instituição associada: | Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Origem: | SciELO Portugal |
| Resumo: | Abstract This legal article aims to confront and foster interactions between the compliance institute and fundamental rights, in theoretical and factual terms. Thus, the present text, resulting from analytical-bibliographic, deductive, inductive and propositional methodology research, intends to advance in one of the facets of the advent of compliance, namely, the relative to its arrival amid the figure of a lot of fundamental rights already classically and constitutionally established. At times in agreement, at times in contrast, compliance policies deserve a deep examination, in order to confirm or not the hypothesis according to which they contrast, harmonize or, simply, are epistemological redundancy inside the larger universe of legal sciences. Classificatory creations and examples will be brought to light, with a greater focus on specific Brazilian legislation, towards which the entire construction and evolution of this Article will be based. |
|---|