Publicação
Dynamic Bayesian networks for stratification of disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
| Resumo: | Background and purpose Progression rate is quite variable in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); thus, tools for profiling disease progression are essential for timely interventions. The objective was to apply dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) to establish the influence of clinical and demographic variables on disease progression rate. Methods In all, 664 ALS patients from our database were included stratified into slow (SP), average (AP) and fast (FP) progressors, according to the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) rate of decay. The sdtDBN framework was used, a machine learning model which learnt optimal DBNs with both static (gender, age at onset, onset region, body mass index, disease duration at entry, familial history, revised El Escorial criteria and C9orf72) and dynamic (ALSFRS-R scores and sub-scores, forced vital capacity, maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum expiratory pressure and phrenic amplitude) variables. Results Disease duration and body mass index at diagnosis are the foremost influences amongst static variables. Disease duration is the variable that better discriminates the three groups. Maximum expiratory pressure is the respiratory test with prevalent influence on all groups. ALSFRS score has a higher influence on FP, but lower on AP and SP. The bulbar sub-score has considerable influence on FP but limited on SP. Limb function has a more decisive influence on AP and SP. The respiratory sub-score has little influence in all groups. ALSFRS-R questions 1 (speech) and 9 (climbing stairs) are the most influential in FP and SP, respectively. Conclusions The sdtDBN analysis identified five variables, easily obtained during clinical evaluation, which are the most influential for each progression group. This insightful information may help to improve prognosis and care. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Gromicho, Marta |
| Outros Autores: | Leão, Tiago; Oliveira Santos, Miguel; Pinto, Susana; Carvalho, Alexandra M.; Madeira, Sara C.; Carvalho, Mamede |
| Assunto: | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Dynamic Bayesian networks Progression Stratification |
| Ano: | 2022 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso restrito |
| Instituição associada: | Universidade de Lisboa |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Origem: | Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
| Resumo: | Background and purpose Progression rate is quite variable in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); thus, tools for profiling disease progression are essential for timely interventions. The objective was to apply dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) to establish the influence of clinical and demographic variables on disease progression rate. Methods In all, 664 ALS patients from our database were included stratified into slow (SP), average (AP) and fast (FP) progressors, according to the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) rate of decay. The sdtDBN framework was used, a machine learning model which learnt optimal DBNs with both static (gender, age at onset, onset region, body mass index, disease duration at entry, familial history, revised El Escorial criteria and C9orf72) and dynamic (ALSFRS-R scores and sub-scores, forced vital capacity, maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum expiratory pressure and phrenic amplitude) variables. Results Disease duration and body mass index at diagnosis are the foremost influences amongst static variables. Disease duration is the variable that better discriminates the three groups. Maximum expiratory pressure is the respiratory test with prevalent influence on all groups. ALSFRS score has a higher influence on FP, but lower on AP and SP. The bulbar sub-score has considerable influence on FP but limited on SP. Limb function has a more decisive influence on AP and SP. The respiratory sub-score has little influence in all groups. ALSFRS-R questions 1 (speech) and 9 (climbing stairs) are the most influential in FP and SP, respectively. Conclusions The sdtDBN analysis identified five variables, easily obtained during clinical evaluation, which are the most influential for each progression group. This insightful information may help to improve prognosis and care. |
|---|