Publicação
Investigação de parâmetros de análise do design de equipamento enquanto ferramenta de impacto social
| Resumo: | This research looks at the issues related to the design and its local dimension. It investigates potential parameters as tools of social, cultural, economic and environmental impact thru the analysis of Brazilian and Portuguese partnerships between designers and local production units. We produced a synthesis description of these partnerships and we delimited (described and analyzed) the different relations to understand these experiences. We also identified the elements to test the impact resulting from these meetings. Two stages divided the investigation. The first characterized a literature review. It involved approaches by different authors about the place of design and local production. We also discussed the approximations and differences between these two areas. There were also the concepts of development, impact, assessment parameters, and indicators. Thus, we produced a theoretical framework. It comprised the description and evaluation of 20 Brazilian and 5 Portuguese case studies. This stage goes beyond the theoretical limits. It verifies in practice the proposed evaluative parameters. We conducted interviews from a semi-structured questionnaire that reached the artificer, the designer and the entities that foster these partnerships. The indicators used proved to be efficient in assessing the social, cultural, economic and territorial dimensions. The final considerations state that we are all artisans. The impact is a two-way street and we also concluded that the collaborative posture in the bilateral creation processes is not only a necessary characteristic but also an essential one. The openness to exchange among the various areas of knowledge and the complementarity of practices (scientific and non-scientific) fosters dialogue to resignify the world to make it better, continuously. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Paoliello, Carla |
| Assunto: | Design Design de equipamento Fazer Local Identidade Artesanato - Brasil Artesanato - Portugal Designers Artífices Estudos de caso Impacto social |
| Ano: | 2019 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | tese de doutoramento |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso aberto |
| Instituição associada: | Universidade de Lisboa |
| Idioma: | português |
| Origem: | Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
| Resumo: | This research looks at the issues related to the design and its local dimension. It investigates potential parameters as tools of social, cultural, economic and environmental impact thru the analysis of Brazilian and Portuguese partnerships between designers and local production units. We produced a synthesis description of these partnerships and we delimited (described and analyzed) the different relations to understand these experiences. We also identified the elements to test the impact resulting from these meetings. Two stages divided the investigation. The first characterized a literature review. It involved approaches by different authors about the place of design and local production. We also discussed the approximations and differences between these two areas. There were also the concepts of development, impact, assessment parameters, and indicators. Thus, we produced a theoretical framework. It comprised the description and evaluation of 20 Brazilian and 5 Portuguese case studies. This stage goes beyond the theoretical limits. It verifies in practice the proposed evaluative parameters. We conducted interviews from a semi-structured questionnaire that reached the artificer, the designer and the entities that foster these partnerships. The indicators used proved to be efficient in assessing the social, cultural, economic and territorial dimensions. The final considerations state that we are all artisans. The impact is a two-way street and we also concluded that the collaborative posture in the bilateral creation processes is not only a necessary characteristic but also an essential one. The openness to exchange among the various areas of knowledge and the complementarity of practices (scientific and non-scientific) fosters dialogue to resignify the world to make it better, continuously. |
|---|