Publicação

SAUC - Street art & urban creativity scientific journal, vol.3, nº2 (Nov. 2017)

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Practice-based approaches from the professional fields of public art and urbanism augmented the academic debate. The Lisbon council’s experience was a particularly relevant contribution for the clarification of the difficulties and opportunities associated with the institutional practice. Several participants emphasized the incompatibilities that may arise when graffiti and street art are developed in an institutionalized manner. It was argued that these forms of urban creativity have a valuable capacity for resilience in adapting both to attempts to institutionalize, and attempts to oppose, these forms of practice.
Autores principais:Neves, Pedro Soares
Outros Autores:Kramer, Ronald; Bogerts, Lisa; Fernández Castelo, Esther; Tolonen, Jonna; Murányi, Kata; Helmy, Mona; Tsiropinas, Paris Xyntarianos; Craveiro, Rodrigo Pena Carvalho dos Anjos; Cardoso, Maria Da Luz Nolasco; Mendelson-Shwartz, Eynat; Mualam, Nir; Jacobson, Malcolm; Abarca, Javier
Assunto:Arte urbana Arte Pública Arte contemporânea Periódicos
Ano:2017
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:outro
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade de Lisboa
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
Descrição
Resumo:Practice-based approaches from the professional fields of public art and urbanism augmented the academic debate. The Lisbon council’s experience was a particularly relevant contribution for the clarification of the difficulties and opportunities associated with the institutional practice. Several participants emphasized the incompatibilities that may arise when graffiti and street art are developed in an institutionalized manner. It was argued that these forms of urban creativity have a valuable capacity for resilience in adapting both to attempts to institutionalize, and attempts to oppose, these forms of practice.