Publicação

The effect of prednisolone therapy on canine serum levels of 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero glutaric acid-(6'-methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) lipase

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:ABSTRACT - 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero glutaric acid-(6'-methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) lipase is a widely available biomarker, increasingly used in the investigation of canine pancreatitis mainly due to its low cost compared to pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (cPLI). A previous study showed a good agreement between cPLI and DGGR lipase concentration. While the effect of corticotherapy on cPLI quantification has been studied, its influence on DGGR lipase is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the effect of prednisolone therapy in canine DGGR lipase serum levels. A prospective cohort study was conducted, including the measurement of DGGR lipase in two groups: the study group (SG) composed of dogs treated with oral prednisolone for a medical reason, at the initial dosage of 0.5-1.7 mg/kg/day for at least 3 weeks, and the control group (CG) composed of healthy untreated dogs. As an inclusion criterion, animals had basal DGGR lipase within the reference range (<80 U/L). DGGR lipase was measured at three time points (Day 0(T0), Day 7-10(T1), and Day 21-30(T2)) in both groups. The analysis was performed using a previously validated kit (Randox® DGGR lipase). Thirty-four dogs were included (17 dogs for each group, which were age and sex-matched). At T0, there was no significant difference in DGGR lipase concentrations between groups (p=0.868). Mean starting dosage of prednisolone was 0.94 (±0.85) mg/kg/day, decreasing to 0.45 (±0.05) mg/kg/day after T1. The median DGGR lipase concentration in SG at each time point (T0, T1, and T2) was: 24.74 (14.45-31.48) U/L, 36.82 (23.8-80.16) U/L and 29.52 (15.91-48.48) U/L, respectively. There was a statistically significant effect of prednisolone on DGGR lipase values (p=0.007) over T0, T1, and T2. A poor correlation was verified between the variations of DGGR lipase and the correspondent prednisolone dosage of T0-T1 and T1-T2 (rs=0.371 e rs=0.121, respectively). In CG, DGGR lipase did not significantly change over the three time points (p=0.926). This study suggests that DGGR lipase levels are affected by oral prednisolone therapy in dogs treated for a medical reason. However, as values remained below the considered significant upper limit (160 U/L), this variation does not seem to be clinically relevant.
Autores principais:Mendoza, Beatriz Costa Gago
Assunto:Dog lipase pancreatitis corticosteroid laboratory diagnosis cão lipase pancreatite corticosteróide diagnóstico de laboratório
Ano:2020
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:dissertação de mestrado
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade de Lisboa
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
Descrição
Resumo:ABSTRACT - 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero glutaric acid-(6'-methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) lipase is a widely available biomarker, increasingly used in the investigation of canine pancreatitis mainly due to its low cost compared to pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (cPLI). A previous study showed a good agreement between cPLI and DGGR lipase concentration. While the effect of corticotherapy on cPLI quantification has been studied, its influence on DGGR lipase is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the effect of prednisolone therapy in canine DGGR lipase serum levels. A prospective cohort study was conducted, including the measurement of DGGR lipase in two groups: the study group (SG) composed of dogs treated with oral prednisolone for a medical reason, at the initial dosage of 0.5-1.7 mg/kg/day for at least 3 weeks, and the control group (CG) composed of healthy untreated dogs. As an inclusion criterion, animals had basal DGGR lipase within the reference range (<80 U/L). DGGR lipase was measured at three time points (Day 0(T0), Day 7-10(T1), and Day 21-30(T2)) in both groups. The analysis was performed using a previously validated kit (Randox® DGGR lipase). Thirty-four dogs were included (17 dogs for each group, which were age and sex-matched). At T0, there was no significant difference in DGGR lipase concentrations between groups (p=0.868). Mean starting dosage of prednisolone was 0.94 (±0.85) mg/kg/day, decreasing to 0.45 (±0.05) mg/kg/day after T1. The median DGGR lipase concentration in SG at each time point (T0, T1, and T2) was: 24.74 (14.45-31.48) U/L, 36.82 (23.8-80.16) U/L and 29.52 (15.91-48.48) U/L, respectively. There was a statistically significant effect of prednisolone on DGGR lipase values (p=0.007) over T0, T1, and T2. A poor correlation was verified between the variations of DGGR lipase and the correspondent prednisolone dosage of T0-T1 and T1-T2 (rs=0.371 e rs=0.121, respectively). In CG, DGGR lipase did not significantly change over the three time points (p=0.926). This study suggests that DGGR lipase levels are affected by oral prednisolone therapy in dogs treated for a medical reason. However, as values remained below the considered significant upper limit (160 U/L), this variation does not seem to be clinically relevant.